Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGithinji, Gerald Gikonyo
dc.contributor.authorKinyua, Miriam
dc.contributor.authorKiplagat, Oliver
dc.contributor.authorBirithia, Rael
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-16T08:43:09Z
dc.date.available2024-09-16T08:43:09Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-31
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Agronomy and Agricultural Research (IJAAR) Vol. 9, No. 2, p. 180-189en_US
dc.identifier.issn2223-7054
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/327050797_Evaluation_of_drought_tolerance_in_mutant_Kenyan_bread_wheat_Triticum_aestivum_L_using_in_vitro_techniques
dc.identifier.urihttps://karuspace.karu.ac.ke/handle/20.500.12092/3167
dc.descriptionAbstracten_US
dc.description.abstractWheat (Triticum aestivum L) is widely cultivated as a small-grain cereal. In Kenya, it is ranked second after maize in its contribution towards food security. Biotic stress conditions such as drought cause extensive losses to agricultural production worldwide. In Kenya, arid and semiarid lands represent 83% of total land area, which experience frequent crop failure due to drought stress. Developing drought-tolerant wheat genotypes has been the focus of many wheat improvement programs. Few drought tolerant varieties are available for commercial production in Kenya. Hence, there is need to develop more drought tolerant wheat varieties. The objective of this study was to screen for drought resistance in two mutant wheat lines in vitro using Polyethylene Glycol (PEG). Four wheat germplasm were tested for drought tolerance using -3.0, -9.0 and -15.0 PEG-6000 concentrations and the data was recorded on various seedling parameters including root length, shoot length and root length /shoot length ratio. The experiment was carried out in three replicates using completely randomized design. Data was subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using GENSTAT 12th edition. Correlation was done by Pearson Correlation Coefficients to determine significant associations among the different variables. Results indicated that there was a significant difference (p=0.05) between Mutant 1 and Mutant 2 having longer roots, shoots and a root to shoot ratio compared to Chozi and Duma in the different PEG concentrations used. Hence, the two mutant lines are possible candidates for varieties that can be grown in ASALs regions in Kenya.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherINNSPUBen_US
dc.subjectBread wheaten_US
dc.subjectDrought toleranceen_US
dc.subjectMutanten_US
dc.subjectPolyethylene glycolen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of drought tolerance in mutant Kenyan bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using in vitro techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record